前哨淋巴结活检在皮肤型和肢端型黑色素瘤临床诊疗中的价值

邹孜瑊, 孙伟, 胡涂, 王春萌, 严望军, 罗志国, 刘欣, 钟景钦, 林馨怡, 徐宇, 陈勇

  1. 1.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院骨软组织外科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
    2.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院消化肿瘤内科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
    3.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院头颈及神经内分泌肿瘤内科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-02 修回日期:2022-12-01 出版日期:2022-12-30 发布日期:2023-02-02
  • 通信作者: 陈勇
  • 作者简介:邹孜瑊(ORCID: 0000-0002-4891-478X),硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82272857);国家自然科学基金(81802636);临港实验室基金(LG-QS-202205-11);上海市科学技术委员会研究项目(19411951700)

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的:前哨淋巴结活检(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)是评估皮肤型和肢端型黑色素瘤区域淋巴结转移情况及病理学分期的重要手段。SLNB作为外科诊疗规范的重要环节,已在各大诊疗指南中被推荐,也已在中国临床应用近10年。自2017年靶向和免疫治疗应用于中国黑色素瘤治疗领域,患者预后得到显著改善。本研究旨在分析复旦大学附属肿瘤医院近5年恶性黑色素瘤患者的临床资料,评估在新药治疗时代前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)状态在临床应用的价值和对预后的影响。方法:对2017—2021年在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院黑色素瘤诊治中心接受诊治的381例恶性黑色素瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。每例患者均接受原发灶扩大切除和相应的SLNB,手术后随访至少6个月。SLN定位使用美兰染色或同位素示踪。结果:本研究共入组381例恶性黑色素瘤患者,平均Breslow浸润深度为3.10 mm,69.8%为肢端型,溃疡率为57.1%,SLN阳性率为34.6%,中位无复发生存率(relapse-free survival,RFS)为17个月。SLN状态是显著影响患者预后的独立危险因素。在N1a和T4亚组,SLN活检数>2枚的患者具有更好的RFS。接受完整的区域淋巴结清扫(complete lymph node dissection,CLND)和未清扫患者的RFS差异无统计学意义,在SLN活检数>2枚和SLN微转移直径<1 mm的亚组未清扫者反而具有更优的RFS。结论:SLN状态仍是影响临床无显性转移的黑色素瘤预后的重要因素,对于恶性黑色素瘤患者应常规开展SLNB,在保证微创的前提下,提高SLN定位的准确性,保证SLNB充分。SLN阳性后行即刻CLND对于皮肤型和肢端型黑色素瘤患者未能带来进一步的预后改善。

关键词: 恶性黑色素瘤, 前哨淋巴结活检, 区域淋巴结清扫, 预后

Abstract:

Background and purpose: For cutaneous and acral malignant melanoma, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an effective tool to evaluate the situation of regional lymph node metastasis and to determine the pathological stage. As an important part of the standard procedure for surgical diagnosis and treatment, SLNB has been recommended in major guidelines and already has a ten-year clinical application. Since the introduction of targeted therapy and immune therapy for malignant melanoma in 2017, the prognosis of patients has been significantly improved. This study aimed to collect the clinical data of Chinese malignant melanoma cases in recent five years so as to discover, in the era of new drug treatment, the significance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in clinical application and its influence on survival outcome. Methods: Data of 381 patients with histologically diagnosed malignant melanoma were retrospectively collected from 2017 to 2021 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. SLNB was performed with wide resection of the primary lesion for each case, and follow-ups of at least 6 months were taken afterwards. Lymphoscintigraphy or methylene blue dye was applied for identification of SLN. Results: A total of 381 patients were included. The mean Breslow thickness was 3.10 mm, among the 381 patients, 69.8% with acral lesion, 59.7% with ulceration, 34.6% with positive SLN, and the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 17 months. Patient’s survival was significantly influenced by SLN status. Patients with more than 2 biopsied SLN had significantly better RFS in subgroups of N1a stage and T4 stage. There was no significant difference in RFS between patients who received complete lymph node dissection (CLND) and those who did no, and the latter even showed better RFS in subgroups of SLN biopsied number >2 and SLN micrometastasis diameter <1 mm. Conclusion: SLN status remained an important factor influencing the prognosis of melanoma cases with no clinical evidence of significant metastasis, and SLNB should be applied as a routine surgical procedure for malignant melanoma patients. While keeping the operation minimally invasive, the accuracy of SLN locating should be improved, and the sufficiency of biopsy should be ensured. Immediate CLND provides no improvement in the prognosis of cutaneous and acral melanoma patients with positive SLN status.

Key words: Malignant melanoma, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Complete lymph node dissection, Prognosis

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] 高鹤丽, 徐近, 虞先濬. 2021年胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤诊治的新进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(9): 772-778.
[2] 张日虹, 郭宇, 梁贇, 陈洛海, 陈洁, 王玮. 辅助化疗对胃神经内分泌癌患者预后的意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(9): 807-817.
[3] 邱鹏飞, 王永胜. 前哨淋巴结时代乳腺癌的精准区域处理:演进与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(8): 680-687.
[4] 曹孟轩, 胡灿, 张延强, 黄灵, 杜义安, 于鹏程, 章若岚, 徐志远, 程向东. 胃癌根治术后早期复发转移的危险因素分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(7): 588-595.
[5] 钱瑶(综述), 刘锋(审校). 乳腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗的研究进展及展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(7): 643-649.
[6] 刘彦权, 胡晓梅, 殷悦, 林霖, 沈建箴, 陈玉婷, 唐焕文. 器官移植术后淋巴组织增生性疾病的临床回顾性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(7): 650-656.
[7] 曲以平, 侯鹏. 转移性儿童甲状腺癌的遗传学特征和预后[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(5): 373-379.
[8] 马光, 区晓敏, 胡超苏, 宋少莉, 杨忠毅. 治疗前18F-FLT和18F-FDG PET/CT摄取异质性在局部晚期鼻咽癌疗效预测中的价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(4): 309-315.
[9] 周长帅, 杨越超, 崔欢欢, 陈磊, 陈鑫, 郝斌, 童彤, 曹依群. 36例小脑转移瘤外科治疗及预后因素分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(4): 357-362.
[10] 杨贻兰, 赵旭, 陈星星, 汪宣伊, 金恺睿, 章真, 邵志敏, 郭小毛, 俞晓立. 乳腺导管原位癌的单中心预后分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(3): 228-233.
[11] 王子茂, 曹原, 王琪影. 皮肤梭形细胞黑色素瘤患者生存预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(3): 234-242.
[12] 陈玺, 曾晓颖, 陈佳艳, 刘菲, 唐曦. 错配修复蛋白联合血清肿瘤标志物与Ki-67增殖指数对结直肠癌预后的临床价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(3): 243-250.
[13] 赵家贤, 江道淮, 丛斌斌, 高飞, 王永胜. 新型光声传感及成像系统探测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的基础研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(2): 106-117.
[14] 侯清华, 钟燕凤, 刘林壮, 吴柳盛, 刘继先. CBX3在肺腺癌中的表达、预后相关性及对癌细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(2): 152-160.
[15] 李婷, 徐宇, 贾东东, 廖智超, 孙伟, 吴海啸, 任志午, 赵军, 邢汝维, 滕胜, 杨蕴, 陈勇, 李涛, 杨吉龙. Ⅲ期恶性黑色素瘤患者术后辅助抗PD-1 vs 靶向治疗:中国多中心真实世界数据分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(12): 1147-1157.