乳腺癌新辅助治疗后腋窝淋巴结转移情况分析

毕钊, 陈鹏, 邱鹏飞, 陈玉光, 王永胜

  1. 山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心,山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院),山东 济南 250117
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-05 修回日期:2023-03-24 出版日期:2023-04-30 发布日期:2023-05-15
  • 通信作者: 王永胜
  • 作者简介:毕钊(ORCID: 0000-0001-9546-1704),博士,住院医师。

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的:多项指南及共识已确认临床淋巴结阳性(clinical nodal positive,cN+)且新辅助治疗(neoadjuvant therapy,NAT)后降期转阴患者接受前哨淋巴结活检(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)的可行性,但分析cN+患者NAT后腋窝淋巴结(axillary lymph node,ALN)各解剖分区转移情况的研究较少。本研究的目的是探索NAT后各腋窝解剖分区ALN的转移情况,为NAT后腋窝降阶梯手术管理提供更充实的理论依据。方法:回顾性分析2018年4月—2020年4月山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心收治499例接受NAT的cN+患者临床病理学参数,其中157例患者NAT后降期转阴接受SLNB联合腋窝淋巴结清扫(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND),342例患者直接行ALND。同时入组2020年5月—2020年12月山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心收治46例临床淋巴结(clinical lymph node,cN)状态为cN1且NAT后降期转阴同时接受靶向腋窝清扫(target axillary dissection,TAD)患者,这部分患者NAT前在超声引导下于阳性ALN放置标记夹,并于术中取出将其作为前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)。分析各解剖分区ALN转移情况。结果:入组499例患者NAT后ALN“跳跃式转移”率仅为0.8%(4/499),SLNB联合ALND组和直接ALND组分别为0.5%和1.0%。NAT后SLN阳性患者中,非SLN(non-SLN,NSLN)阳性率为41.4%。NAT后SLN阴性患者中,NSLN转移率为10.1%,其中cN1、cN2和cN3亚组中NSLN阳性率分别为8.1%、8.7%和21.3%。初诊cN1亚组NAT后SLN阴性患者,SLN 1枚、2枚和3枚阴性时NSLN阳性率分别为11.8%、4.6%和0.0%。初诊cN1且NAT后接受TAD患者,SLN阴性患者NSLN转移率为4.3%,SLN 1枚、2枚和3枚阴性时NSLN阳性率分别为5%、5%和0%,且与检出的阴性SLN数目无关。结论:初诊cN+患者若NAT后SLN阳性,ALND仍是标准处理。初诊cN1患者若采用TAD标记SLN,接受SLNB豁免ALND时可能不再需要考虑阴性SLN数目。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 新辅助治疗, 前哨淋巴结活检, 靶向腋窝清扫技术, 腋窝淋巴结

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Multiple guidelines and consensus have confirmed the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in clinical nodal positive (cN+) patients converting to negative after NAT. There are few studies on the metastasis of axillary lymph node (ALN) at each anatomic level after NAT. This study aimed to explore the metastasis of ALN in each anatomic level, in order to provide more basis for the axillary de-escalation management after NAT. Methods: From April 2018 to 2020, 499 patients in Shandong Cancer Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients (n=157) with initial cN+ and ycN0 disease after NAT underwent SLNB plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Patients (n=342) with initial cN+ and ycN+ disease after NAT had undergone ALND directly. At the same time, from May 2020 to December 2020, 46 patients with initial cN1 and ycN0 disease after NAT underwent targeted axillary dissection (TAD). These patients underwent clip insertion into the most suspicious ALN. Axillary surgery was performed with SLNB plus ALND. The ALN status at each anatomic level was analyzed. Results: Among the 499 patients, the incidence of ALN “skip metastasis” was 0.8% (4/499), similar to those patients without NAT, and it was 0.5% and 1.0% in SLNB group and directly ALND, respectively. Out of the sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive patients after NAT, 41.4% of them had positive non-SLN (NSLN). Out of the SLN-negative patients after NAT, 10.1% of them had positive NSLNs, and the rates of positive NSLNs were 8.1% (5/62), 8.7% (2/23) and 21.3% (3/11) in cN1, cN2, and cN3 subgroups, respectively. In the cN1 subgroup, the NSLNs metastasis rate were 11.8% (4/34), 4.6% (1/22), and 0.0% (0/6) when patients had 1, 2, and 3 negative SLN, respectively. Among the 46 patients receiving TAD, if clips were inserted into the most suspicious ALNs and removed during surgery, the incidence of positive NSLN was 4.3% (2/46). The rates of positive NSLN were 5% (1/20), 5% (1/20), and 0% (0/6) when 1, 2, and 3 negative SLNs were detected, respectively, and it was not related to the number of detected negative SLN. Conclusion: ALND is still the standard axillary treatment in SLN-positive patients after NAT. For patient with initial cN1 and ycN0 disease after NAT, if clips were used to identify biopsied lymph nodes at diagnosis, the number of negative SLN might be no longer the requirement for SLNB to omit ALND after NAT.

Key words: Breast cancer, Neoadjuvant therapy, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Targeted axillary dissection, Axillary lymph node

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] 陈红, 陈俊霞. 环状RNA hsa_circ_0001573对乳腺癌细胞生物学行为的影响及机制研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(4): 342-353.
[2] 曹晓珊, 丛斌斌. 三阳性乳腺癌内分泌治疗联合靶向治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(3): 288-292.
[3] 邵志博, 杨犇龙, 吴炅. 2022年中国乳腺癌重要临床试验成果及最新进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 103-109.
[4] 张会强, 江泽飞. 2022年改变晚期乳腺癌临床实践的重要研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 110-116.
[5] 杨犇龙, 焦得闯, 陈嘉健, 王春建, 金利丹, 赵文和, 高学强, 王海波, 李珺, 赵海东, 吴迪, 范志明, 王淑君, 刘真真, 王永胜, 吴炅. 示踪用盐酸米托蒽醌注射液与核素用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的疗效对比研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 126-133.
[6] 段宝伟, 赵娜, 毕钊, 邱鹏飞, 许兴和, 陈玉光, 樊庆达, 王永胜. 乳腺癌内乳前哨淋巴结活检核素示踪技术优化研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 134-141.
[7] 陈玉光, 孙晓, 毕钊, 邱鹏飞, 段宝伟, 樊庆达, 王永胜. 乳腺癌内乳前哨淋巴结活检评估预后及指导个体化内乳照射:一项长期随访研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 142-151.
[8] 冷婕, 邱国春, 张菠, 蒲艳. 乳腺癌中心体调控蛋白SEC23B在肿瘤浸润转移中的作用及其机制研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 152-161.
[9] 樊庆达, 丛斌斌, 陈玉光, 段宝伟, 王永胜. 临床淋巴结阳性新辅助治疗后腋窝降阶处理的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 174-180.
[10] 郭晴, 张剑. HER2低表达乳腺癌的靶向治疗研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 181-190.
[11] 张景臣, 李新, 李江涛, 李海平, 陈艳丽, 牛冰, 祁川川, 叶贝贝. LINC02163靶向miR-338-3p影响乳腺癌细胞增殖、侵袭及迁移[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(9): 818-826.
[12] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国医师协会外科医师分会乳腺外科医师委员会, 上海市抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 乳腺肿瘤整形与乳房重建专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(9): 836-924.
[13] 肖玉铃, 朱秀之, 江一舟, 邵志敏. 三阴性乳腺癌精准治疗研究的新进展与未来展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(8): 669-679.
[14] 邱鹏飞, 王永胜. 前哨淋巴结时代乳腺癌的精准区域处理:演进与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(8): 680-687.
[15] 张羽, 刘强. 液体活检在乳腺癌精准治疗中的应用进展及展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(8): 688-697.