食管鳞状细胞癌PD-L1不同抗体免疫组织化学检测的一致性分析

陈丽君, 王怡晨, 郑强, 王悦, 金燕, 李媛

  1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院病理科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-17 修回日期:2023-03-21 出版日期:2023-05-30 发布日期:2023-06-16
  • 通信作者: 李媛
  • 作者简介:陈丽君(ORCID: 0000-0002-7139-0515),硕士,医师。

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的:程序性死亡[蛋白]配体-1(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)是食管癌免疫治疗应用最广泛的疗效预测生物标志物,准确可靠的PD-L1检测对于筛查免疫治疗的潜在受益者至关重要。本研究旨在探讨食管鳞状细胞癌(esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,ESCC)患者PD-L1的表达情况以及7种不同克隆号PD-L1抗体免疫组织化学(immunohistochemistry,IHC)检测的一致性,为规范食管癌PD-L1 IHC检测及后续临床研究提供参考。方法:收集2020年1月—2021年12月复旦大学附属肿瘤医院的146例ESCC手术切除标本,用PD-L1 22C3、SP263、28-8、E1L3N XP、CST E1L3N、BP6099和MXR006 7种克隆号抗体进行染色,并采用联合阳性评分(comprehensive positive score,CPS)、肿瘤细胞比例评分(tumor proportion score,TPS)和免疫细胞评分(immune cell proportion score,IPS)3种评分标准,在不同临界值下对抗体的一致性进行统计学分析。结果:PD-L1 22C3与两种伴随诊断抗体(SP263、28-8)对比结果显示:CPS临界值为10时,3种抗体之间均一致性较好(Kappa:0.66 ~ 0.80);CPS临界值为1时,28-8与22C3、SP263抗体一致性较好(Kappa=0.80、0.65),22C3与SP263一致性一般(Kappa=0.49);TPS临界值为10%和1%时,3种抗体之间均具有很高的一致性(Kappa:0.79 ~ 0.89,0.71 ~ 0.91)。PD-L1 22C3与4种国产抗体(E1L3N XP、CST E1L3N、BP6099、MXR006)对比结果显示:CPS临界值为10和TPS临界值为10%时,5种抗体之间均一致性较好(Kappa:0.67 ~ 0.88,0.65 ~ 0.79);CPS临界值为1时,5种抗体之间一致性较好或一般(Kappa:0.58 ~ 0.88);TPS临界值为1%时,5种抗体之间均一致性很好(Kappa:0.85 ~ 0.92);IPS临界值为1%和10%时,5种抗体之间一致性一般或较差(Kappa:0.46 ~ 0.66,0.30 ~ 0.62)。结论:PD-L1 22C3与两种伴随诊断抗体(SP263、28-8)在CPS和TPS中一致性较好;PD-L1 22C3与4种国产抗体(E1L3N XP、CST E1L3N、BP6099、MXR006)在CPS和TPS中一致性较好,而采用IPS时不同克隆号抗体的一致性较差。这些抗体之间具有一定的可互换性,可为食管鳞状细胞癌PD-L1临床检测提供更多选择。

关键词: 食管鳞状细胞癌, 程序性死亡[蛋白]配体-1, 免疫组织化学, 一致性分析

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is the most widely used biomarker for predicting the efficacy of esophageal cancer immunotherapy, and accurate and reliable PD-L1 testing is crucial for screening potential beneficiaries of immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the expression of PD-L1 in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and the consistency and correlation of IHC detection of seven different clones of PD-L1 antibody, and to provide reference for the gradual standardization of PD-L1 IHC detection and follow-up clinical research of esophageal cancer. Methods: This study collected surgically resected and pathologically confirmed specimens from 146 ESCC patients in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2020 to December 2021, and specimens were stained with seven antibodies: PD-L1 22C3, SP263, 28-8, E1L3N XP, CST E1L3N, BP6099 and MXR006, respectively. The consistency of the antibodies was statistically analyzed in different cut-off values using three scoring criteria: comprehensive positive score (CPS), tumor cell proportional score (TPS) and immune cell score (IPS). Results: The results of PD-L1 22C3, SP263 and 28-8 antibodies demonstrated that the consistency between the three antibodies was substantial (Kappa: 0.66-0.80) when CPS cut-off was 10, and the consistency of PD-L1 28-8 with 22C3 and SP263 antibodies was substantial (Kappa=0.80, 0.65) whereas the consistency between PD-L1 22C3 and SP263 was moderate (Kappa=0.49) when CPS cut-off was 1. The three antibodies showed a high consistency when TPS cut-off was 10% and 1% (Kappa: 0.79-0.89, 0.71-0.91). The companion diagnostic PD-L1 22C3 clone antibody and the four domestic clone antibodies E1L3N XP, CST E1L3N, BP6099 and MXR006 consistency study showed that the consistency between the five antibodies was substantial (Kappa: 0.67-0.88, 0.65-0.79) when CPS cut-off was 10 and TPS cut-off was 10%, and the consistency between the five antibodies was substantial or moderate when CPS cut-off was 1 (Kappa: 0.58-0.88). When TPS cut-off was 1%, there was an excellent consistency between the five antibodies (Kappa: 0.85-0.92). Using IPS cut-off of 1% or 10%, the five antibodies showed moderate or poor consistency (Kappa: 0.30-0.62). Conclusion: PD-L1 22C3, SP263 and 28-8 antibodies showed high consistency. PD-L1 22C3 and four domestic antibodies PD-L1 E1L3N XP, CST E1L3N, BP6099 and MXR006 antibodies showed moderate consistency in CPS and TPS, while the consistency was poor in IPS. These antibodies are interchangeable with each other, providing more selectivity for clinical testing needs.

Key words: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Programmed death ligand-1, Immunohistochemistry, Consistency analysis

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] CD阳性淋巴瘤病理专家组. 淋巴瘤CD30免疫组织化学检测及结果判读规范[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(3): 228-234.
[2] 段玉青, 夏宁, 贾云泷, 郑文雅, 刘丽华. SRSF1通过调控VEGFA mRNA可变剪接促进食管鳞状细胞癌Eca9706细胞增殖、侵袭和迁移[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(3): 191-199.
[3] 武全, 郭静伟, 雷雨馨, 胡晓儒, 王哲. MMR蛋白在515例子宫内膜样腺癌中表达及其与临床病理学特征的相关性分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(12): 1190-1198.
[4] 王乾, 张静, 郁成礼, 包龙龙, 蔡旭, 蒋文华, 黄丹, 盛伟琪, 朱晓丽, 周晓燕, 柏乾明. 全自动IdyllaTM系统在中国结直肠癌微卫星不稳定性检测中的可行性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(11): 1084-1090.
[5] 徐 然, 王馨悦, 冯麟媛, 韩安娜, 王艺璇, 杨万山, 刘 超 . 神经胶质瘤中NCAPD2的表达水平及生物学意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(9): 789-798.
[6] 冯润林 , 华 结 , 奎 翔 , 李如懿 , 易晓佳 , 王 燕 , 陶燕萍 . 转移性心包黏液样脂肪肉瘤1例报道并文献复习[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(3): 227-230.
[7] 刘 伟, 王晓江, 张 静, 朱伟峰, 彭凤英, 王健超, 肖伟进, 胡 丹 . 儿童青少年甲状腺髓样癌临床病理学特征及预后分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(11): 1096-1103.
[8] 黄 灵, 邹有瑞, 马 悦, 李琢琦, 高鑫义, 阿布拉古, 马 辉 . 胆碱激酶α在不同级别胶质瘤中的表达差异及临床意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(10): 892-898.
[9] 殷彩桥 , 方呈祥 , 陈 婷 , 黄 慧 , 郑 轶 , 谭家武 , 张继乔 , 张 辉 . miR-203a-3p通过靶向调控GATA6抑制食管鳞癌细胞的增殖和侵袭[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(6): 441-448.
[10] 吴燕妮 , 赵 臣 . 1例甲状腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤的临床病理学特征分析并文献复习[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(6): 462-467.
[11] 王 淋 , 贾 静 , 叶星明 , 林 露 , 陈燕坪 , 陈 颖 . 直肠癌患者组蛋白甲基转移酶hSETD1A表达水平的临床预后价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(5): 369-374.
[12] 李 媛. 病理学指导下的非小细胞肺癌个体化免疫治疗[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(10): 770-776.
[13] 杨 玉, 周欢娣, 薛晓英, 张 歌, 韩雪涛, 田哲森, 李月红 . NRAGE影响人食管癌细胞放射抗性的作用及其机制研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(1): 41-48.
[14] 王宇航,宋全福,吴俊强,南丁阿比雅斯,阿勒哈,庞 达,姜永冬. E R阳性乳腺癌中FGFR1蛋白的表达与ER及预后的关系[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(5): 345-351.
[15] 马家强,曹春梅,Shyamal Goswami,陈 沁,高 强,张晓明. 肝细胞癌组织ICOS+T细胞的多重免疫组织化学检测及其预后价值研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(5): 352-361.