锝[99Tc]亚甲基二膦酸盐注射液单药及联合89SrCl2治疗骨转移瘤效果的meta分析

陈满, 曾飞燕, 李青青, 李宏丹, 林岩松, 冯萍

  1. 1.四川大学华西医院临床试验中心/国家药物临床试验机构/国家药品监督管理局创新药物临床研究与评价重点实验室,四川 成都,610041
    2.中国医学科学院北京协和医院核医学科,北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-21 修回日期:2023-06-30 出版日期:2023-08-30 发布日期:2023-09-01
  • 通信作者: 冯萍 E-mail:fengping@wchscu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈满(ORCID:0000-0001-7030-9968),四川大学华西临床医学院在读硕士研究生。

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的:骨转移瘤是常见的肿瘤骨转移疾病,且患者预后较差,常会合并多种严重并发症,包括骨痛、骨折、脊髓压迫等骨相关事件(skeletal-related event,SRE),影响患者的生活质量。放射性核素治疗对骨转移患者具有较好的效果,可以明显地缓解骨痛。本研究旨在评价锝[99Tc]亚甲基二膦酸盐注射液(99Tc-MDP)单用或联合氯化锶(89SrCl2)治疗骨转移瘤的疗效。方法:数据库检索公开发表在2000年1月—2022年7月的关于99Tc-MDP联合89SrCl2及单用99Tc-MDP治疗骨转移瘤疗效的研究报道,对所有纳入的文献进行资料提取和质量评价,采用Revman 5.3软件进行meta分析。结果:27篇文献符合纳入标准,共2 564例患者纳入本研究。结果显示,与89SrCl2单药组比较,99Tc-MDP联合89SrCl2可提高骨转移瘤患者的骨痛缓解率(RR=1.22,95% CI:1.18~1.27,P<0.001),骨转移灶愈合率(RR=1.35,95% CI:1.25~1.47,P<0.001);单用99Tc-MDP与89SrCl2单药组相比,骨痛缓解率(RR=0.98,95% CI:0.90~1.06,P=0.57)及骨转移灶愈合率(RR=0.93,95% CI:0.82~1.06,P=0.27),差异无统计学意义。99Tc-MDP单用或联合89SrCl2治疗的常见不良反应为白细胞、血小板计数降低,但单用或者联合使用不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(单用89SrCl2 vs 99Tc-MDP联合89SrCl2:RR=0.83,95% CI:0.53~1.30,P=0.42;单用89SrCl2 vs 单用99Tc-MDP:RR=0.93,95% CI:0.76~1.13,P=0.45)。结论:99Tc-MDP联合89SrCl2治疗能够有效地缓解骨转移瘤患者的疼痛,其骨转移瘤的骨痛缓解率及骨转移灶愈合率均优于89SrCl2单药治疗组,且不良反应未明显增加。由于本研究在纳入文献质量及数量等方面存在局限性,故今后需要更高质量的随机对照研究验证。

关键词: 骨转移瘤, 锝[99Tc]亚甲基二膦酸盐注射液, 氯化锶, Meta分析

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Bone metastatic tumor is a common disease of tumor bone metastasis, and the prognosis of patients is poor, with a variety of serious complications, including bone pain, fracture, spinal cord compression and other skeletal related events, affecting the quality of life of patients. At present, radionuclide therapy still has positive clinical effects in patients with bone metastasis, and it still plays an important role in relieving bone pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of technetium [99Tc] methylene diphosphonate injection (99Tc-MDP) alone or in combination with strontium chloride (89SrCl2) in the treatment of bone metastases. Methods: Databases were used to search for studies published between January 2000 and July 2022 on the efficacy of 99Tc-MDP in combination with 89SrCl2 and 99Tc-MDP alone in the treatment of bone metastases. All included literature was extracted and evaluated for quality, and Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Twenty-seven publications met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 2564 patients were included in this study. The results demonstrated that 99Tc-MDP combined with 89SrCl2 improved bone pain relief (RR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.18-1.27, P<0.001) and bone metastasis healing (RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.25-1.47, P<0.001). However, when compared with 89SrCl2 alone, it could not be concluded that 99Tc-MDP alone increased the rate of bone pain relief (RR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.90-1.06, P=0.57) and bone metastasis healing (RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.82-1.06, P=0.27), and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The common adverse effects of 99Tc-MDP treatment alone or in combination with 89SrCl2 were decreased leukocyte and platelet counts, however, the difference in the incidence of adverse effects between 99Tc-MDP treatment alone and in combination with 89SrCl2 was not statistically significant (89SrCl2 vs 99Tc-MDP in combination with 89SrCl2: RR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.53-1.30, P=0.42; 89SrCl2 vs 99Tc-MDP: RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.76-1.13, P=0.45). Conclusion: 99Tc-MDP combined with 89SrCl2 treatment was effective in relieving pain in patients with bone metastases, and the bone pain relief rate and bone metastasis healing rate of 99Tc-MDP combined with 89SrCl2 treatment for bone metastases were better compared with the 89SrCl2 monotherapy group, with no significant increase in adverse reactions after typical dosing. Due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of literature included in this study, higher quality randomized controlled studies are needed.

Key words: Bone metastasis, 99Tc-MDP, 89SrCl2, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] 王宝华, 沙宇婷, 何凤蝶, 吴 静. 前列腺特异性抗原对中国人群前列腺癌早期检测价值的Meta分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(11): 879-886.
[2] 康?勋,张锡友,陈? 峰,李丹丹,董倩倩,宋清坤,钟晓松,李文斌 . CAR-T治疗B细胞淋巴瘤不良反应的Meta分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(8): 568-575.
[3] 杨?青,区晓敏,胡超苏. 血小板-淋巴细胞比值在鼻咽癌预后预测中的作用:Meta分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(8): 576-582.
[4] 王秀月,赵 川,陈 彻,等. 长链非编码RNA作为肝细胞癌诊断新型血清标志物的meta分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(3): 229-235.
[5] 郑鑫林,夏学阳,张金周,等. 胸腔镜下肺段切除与肺叶切除治疗临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2016, 26(10): 854-860.