MRI鉴别宫颈腺体叶状增生与宫颈胃型腺癌的价值

马凤华, 姜安绮, 陈奕清, 徐丛剑, 康玉

  1. 1.复旦大学附属妇产科医院放射科,上海 200011
    2.复旦大学附属妇产科医院妇科,上海 200011
    3.上海市女性生殖内分泌相关疾病重点实验室,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-29 修回日期:2024-04-03 出版日期:2024-04-30 发布日期:2024-05-17
  • 通信作者: 徐丛剑,康玉
  • 作者简介:马凤华(ORCID: 0000-0002-6486-8058),博士,副主任医师;
    姜安绮(ORCID: 0009-0004-8954-2435),博士研究生在读。
    第一联系人:马凤华和姜安绮为共同第一作者。

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的:宫颈胃型腺癌(gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma,G-EAC)是一种少见的宫颈腺癌,临床表现不典型,病灶隐匿,极易漏诊、误诊,患者预后差;而宫颈腺体叶状增生(lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia,LEGH)及非典型LEGH(atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia,aLEGH)是G-EAC的癌前病变,与G-EAC存在临床、病理学及影像学等诸多重叠,术前诊断极具挑战性。本文旨在分析宫颈囊实性病变的磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)表现与病理学诊断结果的相关性,以提高LEGH与G-EAC鉴别诊断的准确性。方法:收集2016年7月—2023年8月在复旦大学附属妇产科医院就诊的37例LEGH和53例G-EAC患者的临床、影像学及病理学资料。采用χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法等进行统计学分析,采用logistic回归进行多因素分析,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线进行效能评价。结果:LEGH和G-EAC两组间患者年龄、症状、病灶范围、大小、成分、强化程度、宫颈间质环、子宫内膜累及、淋巴结肿大、宫腔积液差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LEGH及aLEGH组病灶位于宫颈黏膜层,主要表现为大、微小囊混合型或密集微小囊型(32/37),囊壁多明显强化(31/37);而G-EAC组中多累及宫颈肌层(42/53),多见实性成分(52/53)和低信号间质环中断或消失(46/53)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,病灶实性成分(OR = 50.064)和宫颈间质环中断(OR = 40.180)可作为预测G-EAC的显著MRI特征。综合病灶大小、成分、强化程度、宫颈间质环和子宫内膜累及5个特征,对诊断G-EAC的效能采用ROC分析,曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)为0.970(95% CI:0.931 ~ 1.008)。结论:结合宫颈囊实性病变的多个MRI征象有助于鉴别LEGH与G-EAC。

关键词: 宫颈腺体叶状增生, 宫颈胃型腺癌, 癌前病变, 磁共振成像, 鉴别诊断

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is a rare variant of endocervical adenocarcinoma, characterized by atypical clinical manifestations and elusive lesions. Due to these factors, G-EAC is prone to being missed or misdiagnosed, significantly impacting the prognosis. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) and atypical LEGH (aLEGH) are considered to be precancerous lesions of G-EAC. These conditions also present overlapping clinical, pathologic and imaging manifestations, making it challenging to differentiate between them preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of cystic-solid lesions in the cervix and their underlying pathology in order to enhance the accuracy of distinguishing between LEGH and G-EAC, ultimately aiding in the early diagnosis and appropriate management of these conditions. Methods: Clinical, imaging and pathological data of 37 LEGH and 53 G-EAC patients who attended the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from July 2016 to August 2023 were collected. Analysis was conducted using Pearson Chi-square χ2, Fisher’s exact tests and so on. Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for performance evaluation. Results: In this study, differences in age, symptoms, extent, size, composition, degree of enhancement, cervical stromal ring, endometrium invasion, pelvic lymph nodes enlargement, and hydrohystera were statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). In the LEGH and aLEGH groups, lesions were primarily localized to the epithelial layer of the endocervical canal. These lesions were predominantly simple cystic (32/37), and the cystic walls often displayed significant enhancement (31/37). In contrast, the G-EAC group presented with lesions involving the myometrium of the uterine cervix (42/53). These lesions were characterized by a solid component in the majority of cases (52/53), a tendency for the disappearance of the cervical stromal ring (46/53). Logistic regression analysis revealed that among the MRI features, lesion composition (OR = 50.064) and incomplete cervical stromal ring (OR = 40.180) were significant predictors for G-EAC. ROC analysis, incorporating lesion size, composition, enhancement degree, cervical stromal ring, and endometrial involvement, yielded an area under curve (AUC) of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.931-1.008). Conclusion: Combining multiple MRI features of cystic-solid lesions in the cervix aids in distinguishing between LEGH and G-EAC.

Key words: Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma, Precancerous lesions, Magnetic resonance imaging, Differential diagnosis

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] 刘琪, 常才, 李佳伟. 乳腺导管原位癌的影像学表现与分子分型、组织病理学分级及预后相关性的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(2): 201-209.
[2] 王雁, 苏越, 胡涂, 刘绮颖, 姚伟强, 陈勇, 严望军, 章真. 33例接受术前放疗的局部高危软组织肉瘤患者近期疗效和安全性回顾性分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(7): 693-700.
[3] 陈如串, 刘伟, 周冰妮, 刘晓航, 周良平. VI-RADS联合肿瘤基底接触长度检测肌层浸润性膀胱癌的价值研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(3): 260-266.
[4] 刘彦权, 胡晓梅, 殷悦, 林霖, 沈建箴, 陈玉婷, 唐焕文. 器官移植术后淋巴组织增生性疾病的临床回顾性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(7): 650-656.
[5] 周冰妮, 刘晓航, 顾丙新, 周良平, 顾雅佳. mpMRI联合 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT检测前列腺癌新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗后显著残留病灶的价值研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(2): 134-141.
[6] 石月, 陈奕清, 丁景新, 宁燕, 汪清, 马凤华, 谭灏文, 康玉. 中国Peutz-Jeghers综合征女性患者妇科疾病诊治现状调查[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(11): 1049-1064.
[7] 张家祥, 周永学, 闫曙光, 赵唯含, 董汾. 缺氧诱导的线粒体自噬与糖代谢重编程对胃癌前病变影响的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(10): 1007-1015.
[8] 罗 容, 胡培安, 解添淞, 张泽华, 周良平, 周正荣, 陈 雷 . 黏液纤维肉瘤影像学表现、临床特征及病理学的相关性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(8): 734-739.
[9] 胡冠男, 陈 雷, 周良平, 周正荣 . 肺恶性黑色素瘤合并肺腺癌1例并文献复习[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(7): 647-650.
[10] 董诗洁, 胡晓欣, 王 葳, 杨 孟, 岳 磊, 童 彤, 顾雅佳. 基于多序列MRI与多体系影像组学模型预测子宫颈癌淋巴结转移的研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(6): 460-467.
[11] 冯润林 , 华 结 , 奎 翔 , 李如懿 , 易晓佳 , 王 燕 , 陶燕萍 . 转移性心包黏液样脂肪肉瘤1例报道并文献复习[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(3): 227-230.
[12] 孙瑞红,王 翔,沈丽娟,孟凡华,尹化斌 . 乳腺癌患者MRI体素内不相干运动成像中感兴趣区选择方法对参数一致性的影响[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(9): 700-708.
[13] 王敏红,周理想,冯 湛. 常规MRI纹理分析鉴别脑胶质母细胞瘤和原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(4): 284-288.
[14] 陈俊慧,张 曼,刘水澎,马 琳,刘 洋,李晓松,孟 健,李 劼,张树华. 基于超声征象多因素logistic回归β值积分法的甲状腺癌风险预测研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(4): 289-293.
[15] 顾丙新,孙玉云,杨忠毅,罗建民,张建平,章英剑. 99mTc-转铁蛋白-DTPA-Gd核素/磁性双模态分子影像探针基于转铁蛋白受体表达水平的肿瘤成像[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(2): 119-124.