探索阳性淋巴结比率在ypⅢ期结直肠癌患者中的预后价值及预测模型的建立

伍雯, 张若昕, 翁俊勇, 马延磊, 蔡国响, 李心翔, 杨永志

  1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院大肠外科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-24 修回日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2024-09-30 发布日期:2024-10-11
  • 通信作者: 杨永志
  • 作者简介:伍雯(ORCID: 0000-0002-0144-782X),博士,主治医师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82272976);复旦大学“卓越2025”卓学优秀人才项目

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的: 当前,对于中低位局部晚期直肠癌和T4bM0的潜在可切除结肠癌患者,指南均推荐新辅助治疗策略,以提高治疗的缓解率和增加转化性切除的可能性。其中对于ypⅢ期的结直肠癌(colorectal cancer,CRC)患者,均使用国际抗癌联盟(Union for International Cancer Control,UICC)/美国癌症联合会(American Joint Committee on Cancer,AJCC)TNM分期系统评估术后病理学特征。然而,新辅助治疗会导致术区淋巴结退缩,检出淋巴结数不足12枚的患者无法按照常规的TNM分期进行划分,因此TNM分期常无法预测接受过新辅助治疗的ypⅢ期患者的预后。本研究旨在评估阳性淋巴结比率(positive lymph node ratio,LNR)在接受新辅助治疗的ypⅢ期CRC患者中的预后价值。方法: 回顾性分析2008—2018年在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院接受新辅助治疗且行根治性手术的ypⅢ期CRC患者。收集患者手术时的年龄、性别、原发肿瘤位置、肿瘤分化等级、病理学分期以及随访期间患者是否复发或死亡等临床病理学特征。纳入标准:接受新辅助治疗和手术且术后病理学检查证实为Ⅲ期的CRC患者。排除标准:① 术前影像学检查或术中探查发现已有远处脏器转移;② 有既往恶性肿瘤病史;③ 多原发性CRC。本研究通过复旦大学附属肿瘤医院医学伦理委员会批准(伦理编号:050432-4-2108*)。使用R软件的survminer包(surv_cutpoint算法)计算LNR相对于无病生存期(disease-free survival,DFS)的最佳临界值并依此将患者分为低LNR组和高LNR组,比较两组的临床病理学特征和DFS。采用COX比例风险回归模型筛选不良病理学特征并使用survival包和rms包绘制DFS列线图预测模型。结果: 共纳入489例患者,男性289例,女性200例,中位年龄为56岁(23~80岁),中位随访时间为1 062 d。随访期间,164例(33.5%)患者死亡。整个队列中,204例(41.7%)患者检出淋巴结数不足12枚。LNR的最佳临界值为0.29,317例患者划为低LNR组(LNR≤0.29),172例患者划为高LNR组(LNR>0.29)。高LNR组相比低LNR组DFS更短[风险比(hazard ratio,HR)=2.103,95% CI:1.582~2.796,P<0.000 1]。多变量COX回归分析显示,LNR是DFS的独立预后危险因素(HR=1.825,95% CI:1.391~2.394,P<0.001)。根据纳入LNR的多分类DFS列线图预测模型可以有效地评估接受新辅助治疗的Ⅲ期CRC患者的DFS。结论: LNR是ypⅢ期CRC患者的独立预后因素,与其他不良临床病理学特征联合使用具有良好的DFS预测效力。因此,将LNR作为TNM分期的补充可以提高CRC的预后评估准确率。

关键词: 结直肠癌, 新辅助治疗, 阳性淋巴结比率, 预后, 预测模型

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Currently, for patients with mid-to-low locally advanced rectal cancer and potentially resectable T4bM0 colon cancer, guidelines recommend neoadjuvant therapy strategies to enhance the response rate and increase the likelihood of conversion surgery. Among these patients, ypⅢ stage colorectal cancer (CRC) is assessed using the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system for postoperative pathological features. However, neoadjuvant therapy can lead to lymph node regression in the surgical area, resulting in an insufficient number of detected lymph nodes (less than 12), preventing classification according to conventional TNM staging. Thus, TNM staging often fails to predict the prognosis of ypⅢ patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) in ypⅢ stage CRC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Retrospective data was collected from ypⅢ stage CRC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent radical surgery at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 2008 and 2018. Collect clinical pathological characteristics such as age, gender, primary tumor location, tumor differentiation grade, pathological staging, and whether the patient has relapsed or died during follow-up at the time of surgery. Inclusion criteria: CRC patients who have received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery and have been confirmed to be stage Ⅲ by postoperative pathological examination. Exclusion criteria: ① Preoperative imaging examination or intraoperative exploration reveals distant organ metastasis; ② History of malignant tumors in the past; ③ Multiple primary CRC. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (ethics number: 050432-4-2108*). The R software survminer package (surv_cutpoint algorithm) was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value for LNR relative to disease-free survival (DFS), and patients were divided into low and high LNR groups accordingly. Clinical pathological characteristics and DFS were compared between the two groups. COX proportional hazards regression models were employed to identify adverse pathological features, and survival plots along with prediction models for DFS were generated using the survival and rms packages. Results: A total of 489 patients were included, comprising 289 males and 200 females, with a median age of 56 years (23-80 years) and a median follow-up time of 1 062 d. During the follow-up period, 164 patients (33.5%) died. In the entire cohort, 204 (41.7%) patients had fewer than 12 lymph nodes detected. The optimal cutoff value for LNR was 0.29, classifying 317 patients into the low LNR group (LNR≤0.29) and 172 patients into the high LNR group (LNR>0.29). The high LNR group exhibited shorter DFS compared to the low LNR group [hazard ratio (HR)=2.103, 95% CI: 1.582-2.796, P<0.000 1]. Multivariate COX regression indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR=1.825, 95% CI: 1.391-2.394, P<0.001). The inclusion of LNR in a multicategory DFS nomogram prediction model effectively assessed DFS in stage Ⅲ CRC patients who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusion: LNR is an independent prognostic factor for ypⅢ stage CRC patients, showing good predictive power for DFS when combined with other adverse pathological features. Therefore, incorporating LNR as a supplement to TNM staging can improve the accuracy of CRC prognosis assessment.

Key words: Colorectal cancer, Neoadjuvant therapy, Positive lymph node ratio, Prognosis, Predictive model

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] 黄浩哲, 陈红, 郑德重, 陈超, 王英, 许立超, 王耀辉, 何新红, 杨媛媛, 李文涛. 基于CT的影像组学诺模图预测结直肠癌肺转移射频消融后的局部肿瘤进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(9): 857-872.
[2] 肖锋, 许桐林, 朱琳, 肖静文, 吴天祺, 顾春燕. M1型肿瘤相关巨噬细胞在肝细胞癌组织中浸润的意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(8): 726-733.
[3] 葛祖荫, 宋坤, 林云霄, 钟烨凌, 郝敬铎. 循环肿瘤细胞FCGBP和BIGH3作为结直肠癌潜在生物标志物的可行性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(8): 745-752.
[4] 翁俊勇, 叶紫岚, 张若昕, 刘琪, 李心翔. 探究不良病理学特征数量对Ⅰ~Ⅲ期结直肠癌复发风险分层的指导作用:对9 875例病例的回顾性队例研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(6): 527-536.
[5] 唐楠, 黄慧霞, 刘晓健. 利用单细胞测序和转录组测序建立结直肠癌免疫细胞的9基因预后模型[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(6): 548-560.
[6] 张若昕, 叶紫岚, 翁俊勇, 李心翔. 高龄与Ⅱ期结直肠癌患者预后不良的相关性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(5): 485-492.
[7] 薛驰, 高鹏, 朱志, 王振宁. 免疫治疗在胃癌的围手术期及转化治疗中的应用和挑战[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(3): 259-267.
[8] 陆悦, 卢仁泉, 张杰, 郑慧. 联合凝血功能指标在结直肠癌患者化疗后高凝状态监测中的应用价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(3): 278-285.
[9] 上海市抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 结直肠癌早筛、早诊、早治上海方案(2023年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(1): 13-66.
[10] 金奕滋, 林明曦, 张剑. 乳腺癌原发灶与肝转移灶受体表达差异研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(9): 834-843.
[11] 吴晗, 杨章孺, 冯雯, 曾琬琴, 郭金栋, 李洪选, 王常禄, 王家明, 吕长兴, 张琴, 余雯, 蔡旭伟, 傅小龙. 多原发性早期肺癌立体定向放射治疗后疗效及患者预后分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(9): 844-856.
[12] 陈金娟, 王星然, 李文质, 程煜, 孙艺华, 陶祥, 马凤华, 孙莉, 赵洪波, 鹿欣. 保守手术治疗的10例Ⅰ期胎盘部位滋养细胞肿瘤病例报告及文献复习[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(9): 857-865.
[13] 孙洋, 王炼, 赵萌, 张小凤, 耿志军, 王月月, 宋雪, 左芦根, 李静, 胡建国. 胃癌中FKBP1A高表达的预后价值及其靶向PI3K/AKT对糖代谢的调控作用[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(8): 726-739.
[14] 姜琳, 刘绮颖, 贾利晴, 张静, 常恒, 薛田, 任敏, 柏乾明, 朱晓丽, 周晓燕. 胶质瘤中MGMT甲基化状态及其临床意义的回顾性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(8): 740-750.
[15] 董浩, 邱勇刚, 汪鑫斌, 杨俊杰, 楼存诚, 叶晓丹. 基于高分辨率CT征象建立logistic回归模型对IA期肺腺癌高级别模式的预测价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(8): 768-775.