卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗及靶向治疗在复发、转移及初治晚期宫颈癌中的疗效与安全性分析:一项回顾性队列研究

范素梅, 信聪伶, 朱来芳, 刘畅, 徐蕊, 周正荣, 程玺

  1. 1.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院闵行院区肿瘤妇科,上海 201100
    2.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院闵行院区药剂科,上海 201100
    3.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
    4.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院闵行院区放射诊断科,上海 201100
    5.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤妇科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-13 修回日期:2025-05-27 出版日期:2025-06-30 发布日期:2025-07-14
  • 通信作者: 程玺(0000-0001-5568-7709),博士,主任医师,教授。
  • 作者简介:范素梅(0009-0007-3361-8455),学士,主治医师。

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

背景与目的: 复发、转移及初治晚期宫颈癌的治疗仍面临挑战,免疫治疗联合化疗及靶向治疗初步显示出临床获益,但现有证据有限。本研究旨在评估卡瑞利珠联合化疗及靶向治疗对复发、转移及初治晚期宫颈癌患者预后的影响。方法: 回顾性分析2019—2025年复旦大学附属肿瘤医院闵行院区收治的符合纳入和排除标准的复发、转移及初治晚期宫颈癌患者的临床资料,使用对数秩检验进行生存分析,并通过单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析探讨预后的相关因素。本研究获得了复旦大学附属肿瘤医院闵行院区伦理委员会的审批[伦理批号:(2024)伦审第(015)号]并豁免患者知情同意。结果: 本研究共纳入130例患者。根据是否接受卡瑞利珠单抗分为观察组70例(卡瑞利珠单抗,可联合化疗与靶向治疗)和对照组60例(化疗联合靶向治疗)。观察组的客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)为72.9%,疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)为80.0%,显著优于未接受免疫治疗的对照组(ORR=20.0%,χ2=36.1,P<0.001;DCR=40.0%,χ2=21.8,P<0.001)。观察组未达到中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),优于对照组(中位PFS=7.0个月,P<0.001),Cox比例风险回归模型分析显示卡瑞利珠单抗治疗是PFS的独立保护因素(P<0.001),而患者的年龄、复发转移部位、初始治疗方式和病理学类型对PFS无显著影响。观察组有29例患者(41.4%)发生≥3级不良反应,主要包括血管增生、甲减、过敏和腹泻等。结论: 在复发、转移及初治晚期宫颈癌的治疗中,卡瑞利珠单抗治疗显著改善了患者的治疗效果和预后,延长了患者的PFS。尽管存在一定比例的≥3级不良反应,但整体上患者可接受。在实际临床中,免疫治疗联合化疗及靶向治疗为患者提供了更为有效的治疗选择。

关键词: 宫颈癌, 免疫治疗, 化疗, 靶向治疗, 复发, 转移, 初治晚期, 预后

Abstract:

Background and purpose: The treatment of recurrent, metastatic, and treatment-naïve advanced cervical cancer remains challenging. Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy has shown preliminary clinical benefits, however, current evidence remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and targeted therapy on the prognosis of patients with recurrent, metastatic, and treatment-naïve advanced cervical cancer. Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data from 130 patients with recurrent, metastatic, and treatment-naïve advanced cervical cancer admitted to Minhang Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 2019 to 2025. The patients were categorized into the observation group (n=70), which included those who received camrelizumab with or without chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and the control group (n=60), including those who received chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to explore prognostic factors. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Minhang Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center[Approval number: (2024) Review No. (015)] and all informed consents were exempted. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) in the observation group was 72.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80.0%, which were significantly higher than those in the control group with an ORR of 20.0% (χ2=36.1, P<0.001) and a DCR of 40.0% (χ2=21.8, P<0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the observation group was not reached, significantly longer than that in the control group of 7.0 months (P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified camrelizumab treatment as an independent protective factor for PFS (P<0.001). Age, site of recurrence/metastasis, initial treatment approach, and histopathological type were not significantly associated with PFS. In the observation group, adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 29 patients (41.4%), which primarily included vasculitis, hypothyroidism, hypersensitivity reactions, and diarrhea. Conclusion: The use of camrelizumab significantly improved treatment outcomes and prognosis for patients with recurrent, metastatic, and treatment-naïve advanced cervical cancer, with significantly improved progression-free survival. Although a certain proportion of patients experienced adverse events of grade 3 or higher, the overall safety profile was acceptable. In clinical practice, immunotherapy offers a more effective treatment option for patients.

Key words: Cervical cancer, Immunotherapy, Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy, Recurrence, Metastasis, Treatment-naive, Prognosis

中图分类号: 

相关文章

[1] 杜心悦, 邬思雨, 柳光宇. 乳腺癌术后孤立腋窝淋巴结复发的临床特征与治疗进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(6): 592-600.
[2] 李浩, 邓瑾, 刘沛华, 张泉涌, 蔡寨. 食管胃结合部腺癌皮肤转移1例报道及疗效分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(6): 601-604.
[3] 中国抗癌协会癌症康复与姑息治疗专业委员会, 福建省抗癌协会癌痛专业委员会. 化疗相关腹泻全程管理中国专家共识(2025年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(6): 605-630.
[4] 应磊磊, 李珂宁, 陈超, 王英, 黄浩哲, 王标, 李文涛, 何新红. 肿瘤直径对结直肠癌肺转移患者射频消融术后生存及局部进展风险的影响研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(5): 449-456.
[5] 刘笛, 倪建佼, 赵快乐, 相加庆, 章真, 张军华. 261例局限期食管小细胞癌患者的临床、预后及治疗模式分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(5): 465-477.
[6] 童刚, 华杨, 彭薇, 赵桔, 胡钧文. TACE联合安罗替尼及信迪利单抗治疗CNLC Ⅱb~Ⅲb期肝癌患者的疗效及安全性评估[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(5): 478-484.
[7] 王星, 肖枘伶, 白嘉璐, 蒋德诚, 周飞晗, 罗稀元, 唐玥萌, 赵玉沛. 肿瘤嗜器官性转移的双向选择与共同适应机制[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(5): 485-495.
[8] 彭东阁, 万子叶, 卢宁. 人工智能在胃癌诊疗和患者预后预测中的应用现状及未来展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(5): 496-504.
[9] 王益林, 王鲁. 鼻咽癌肝转移患者肝部分切除术与经导管动脉化疗栓塞术的远期疗效比较分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(5): 505-509.
[10] 邓绮玲, 宋迪, 奚可欣, 谢晓婷, 吴小延, 赵卫. 血浆游离DNA检测对非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗相关基因筛选及患者预后预测的研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(4): 355-364.
[11] 贾瑞杰, 石志强, 张琦, 逯永晋, 郑竣升, 孙菁, 毕钊, 孙晓, 王永胜, 邱鹏飞. 乳腺癌内乳前哨淋巴结活检与患者预后的相关性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(4): 394-403.
[12] 李彬, 陶中华, 胡夕春. CDK4/6抑制剂后时代下的乳腺癌精准诊疗[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(3): 273-282.
[13] 赵锴乐, 王磊, 耿健雄, 崔成伟, 于雁. 恶性胸膜间皮瘤治疗的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(3): 326-332.
[14] 卢愚风, 王晗, 谢亦璠, 江一舟, 邵志敏. 中国乳腺癌重要基础转化研究——进展与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(2): 143-153.
[15] 林佳琳, 王文娜, 徐兵河. 抗体药物偶联物在乳腺癌领域的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(2): 154-166.